+ Take a page from Enterprise, give Akagi very fast aircraft recovery. She had A6M2s, the early war stuff.Ī Tier VIII CV with Tier VI IJN planes would lose planes rapidly. For example, Akagi was not around for mid-late war planes like the A6M5 Zero. Tier VI IJN aircraft, which would be historical. What I would do to put Akagi in WoWS and be historical at the same time. Taiho at tier X ( I agree with u on that) Might Akagi at tier VIII (because Unryu might higher chance becoming a premium) Hiryu or Hiyo at tier VI (agree on what u about said with Hiryu)(On the Hiyo we have Junyo might be coming I don't know when) Zuiho at tier IV (because that where she belong) Taiho at tier 10, for lack of a better fit, she's really tier 9 material. Unryu at tier 8 (more AA and better planes than Hiryu) Hiryu at tier 6 (because Shokaku is an improved development of her, and at tier 8 already) use her pearl harbor airwing as she's really a tier 7 CV. Shinano at tier 10, for lack of a better fit, get her to 28 knots, pour some AA guns on her, or use some of the Hak's 40's, with good planes, and she's probably ok. Again, not a deal breaker, but would have been a nice touch to have that as well.Akagi would make a nice tech tree tier 8 in an alternate line.Īkagi at tier 8, because that's here she belongs. It doesn't have the name of the ship on display, on the nameplate. The second thing I noticed, was on the display stand. Not a deal breaker, just would be awesome if that small detail, though would barely be viewed, was there.Ģ. I looked at it, and thought "It would be cool if that clock is synchronized with the real time clock," so watched it, and discovered it is not. In the background, when you rotate the camera, and view the ship from the other side, I noticed a clock. However, there are two minor details that I believe were overlooked these details though minor, could have really made this port superior to all other portsġ. Examining the new port, and may end up keeping it as my primary port, because it's nice to see my ship on display as a model.
0 kommentar(er)
